Origin of enantioselectivity in palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation reactions using chiral N,N-ligands with different rigidity and flexibility.

The chiral bidentate-N,N ligands, (S(a))-1, (S(a))-2, (S,S)-3 and (S,S)-4, were synthesized. They were shown to contain rigid 2-pyridinyl or 8-quinolinyl building blocks and the C(2)-symmetric chiral frameworks trans-2,5-dimethylpyrrolidinyl or (S)-(+)-2,2'-(2-azapropane-1,3-diyl)-1,1'-binaphthalene. In the (S(a))-2, and (S,S)-4 ligands pair, the 8-quinolinyl skeleton is directly bonded to the C(2)-symmetric chiral frameworks (S)-(+)-2,2'-(2-azapropane-1,3-diyl)-1,1'-binaphthalene or trans-2,5-dimethylpyrrolidinyl. This feature induces rigidity in this pair of ligands upon the N,N-framework. However, this does not occur for the (S(a))-1 and (S,S)-3 ligands, in which the presence of the -CH(2)- spacer between the frameworks bearing the nitrogen atom donors gives greater flexibility to the ligand. A further difference between the pairs of ligands is significant from the electronic properties of the chiral framework N-donor atom. The coordinating properties and the specific steric structural features of the (S(a))-1, (S(a))-2, (S,S)-3, and (S,S)-4 ligands are explained by their reactions with the [Pd(PhCN)(2)Cl(2)] and [Pd(eta(3)-PhCHCHCHPh)(mu-Cl)](2) substrates, in which the reported ligands form chelate complexes, with the exception of (S(a))-2, which failed to react with [Pd(eta(3)-PhCHCHCHPh)(mu-Cl)](2). The ligands were used in the palladium-allyl catalyzed substitution reaction of 1,3-diphenylallyl acetate with dimethylmalonate, with the best result being obtained using the (S(a))-1 ligand, giving the substitution product 2-(1,3-diphenylallyl)dimethylmalonate with an enantiomeric excess of 82% in the S form and a yield of 96%. The work demonstrates that in the presence of a steric ligand control, the electronic properties of the ligand donor atoms play a role though not significant in determining the enantioselectivity of palladium(II) catalyzed allylic substitution reactions. The results of the catalytic reaction do not provide a convincing explanation considering the coordinated chiral ligand features, as rigidity or flexibility and electronic properties of the N-donor atoms. A rationalization of the results is proposed on the basis of NMR studies and DFT calculation on the cationic complexes [Pd(eta(3)-PhCHCHCHPh)(N-N*)]CF(3)SO(3), (N-N* = (S(a))-1, 9; (S,S)-3, 10; (S,S)-4, 11).